What are your thoughts on Jo Jorgensen?

She's also big on a non-interventionist foreign policy, wanting to turn the US into a "giant Switzerland: armed and neutral," which means bringing all the troops home from foreign bases and ending foreign aid and military blockages. That's a huge shift from what we are used to, and I know for a school project, that's a key point of difference from the standard candidates. Another interesting area is her plan for healthcare and social security. She wants to replace Social Security with individual retirement accounts, which she calls a "Ponzi scheme," and supports a free-market healthcare system to reduce costs, claiming it could cut them by 75% by allowing real price competition. Her whole thing is less government involvement equals lower costs and more freedom, which is the core libertarian philosophy.

One thing about Jorgensen that I find really interesting is her position on immigration. Unlike the main parties, she supports decriminalizing border crossing for nonviolent immigrants and wants easy, legal paths for peaceful people to visit, work, or live here. She even said she would immediately stop construction on the border wall. It's a completely open-market approach to labor and trade, which is a very pure libertarian take and a huge contrast to what you hear from the big two parties.

She's the type of candidate who appeals to people who are just really fed up with the two major parties and the debt and endless wars. She clearly stated that the non-choice between Trump and Biden was still "an option between big government and more big government," so her whole campaign was about offering a truly small-government alternative. She was the first woman to lead the Libertarian Party's presidential ticket, too, which is a cool historical fact. Her career is mostly in academia, a psychology lecturer, and she's been involved with the Libertarian Party for decades, running for VP way back in '96. Her main goal, across the board, is to reduce the scale and scope of the federal government in almost every aspect of life.

The whole Jo Jorgensen idea of making America like a "giant Switzerland" is probably the most memorable part of her platform, at least for me. It's the whole non-interventionist foreign policy, pulling troops out of foreign countries, ending the US involvement in foreign wars and blockades, and just focusing on defending our own shores. It's a really interesting angle because it's so different from both Republicans and Democrats, who usually support some level of global military presence. For a school assignment, that's a strong talking point about her unique approach.

 If you're looking at Jo Jorgensen for a project, you should really highlight her economic views. She is all about deregulation and massive tax cuts to stimulate the economy, arguing that government spending and regulation are what kill jobs and growth. She wants to repeal trade barriers and tariffs, like those put in place by Trump, because she says they're just a tax paid by American consumers. The idea is that a completely free market will naturally solve most problems, including making health care affordable, without government meddling.

I remember Jo Jorgensen from the 2020 election as the Libertarian candidate. Her stance on personal freedom is really consistent across all issues. Like on criminal justice, she wants to abolish the War on Drugs and pardon all nonviolent federal drug offenders, which is a super radical move but totally in line with the "live and let live" libertarian principle. She also supports the Second Amendment and wants to end federal civil asset forfeiture and qualified immunity for police. It’s a very consistent, small-government pitch, and it makes for a good case study on true third-party political positions.

I think her position on health care is one of the more controversial parts of her campaign. She calls single-payer healthcare "disastrous" and thinks the only way to fix things is with a completely free-market system where providers have to compete and costs supposedly drop by 75%. She also wants to let people opt out of Social Security and put that money into individual retirement accounts instead. It’s a very dramatic shift from the status quo, and it shows how far she goes to promote the idea of personal choice and responsibility over government programs.