Pablo Picasso said: ""It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child."" So, which standards does art actually have, if any at all?

REKLAM
yanit +10 yanıt
report Bildir

radcliffe adlı üyenin sorusuna 10 kişi cevap verdi.

Cevaplar
There is no single superior style. If there were, art would stagnate. People have different tastes. People have different ideas and feelings they want to express. We need a variety of ways to express our tastes and ideas.
Bildir
REKLAM
Is there art that's objectively bad?
Bildir
Art is subjective. You can't approach it scientifically, dude, unless you wanna talk social sciences
Bildir
Art has always been subjective.
Bildir
"I feel like the only standard for art is if it makes you think. "Why that colour? Why is there one big, blue rectangle?" Questions like that. Or even more thought provoking questions, too. "
Bildir
Trend is the standard. From a society of beholders certain beholdings spread and take root.
Bildir
Art has no standards. That is the point. It is evaluated on its function and its ability to communicate emotions and/or ideas.
Bildir
"The only standard in art has been "the eye of the beholder". "
Bildir
To paint like a child means to have the imagination of one. Not ability to paint.
Bildir
The only standard for art is when you're dead your art will inevitably sell better.
Bildir

Topluluğa katılmak ister misin?

Paylaşım yapmak ve etkileşime geçmek için giriş yapmalısın.
Kategoriler
Bu içeriği paylaş
Hazırlanıyor...
🏆 En iyiler
Yükleniyor...